Hello my friend, let’s see where we’re left in the geometric ambigrams map.
Do you see what I see?
Well… no?
Follow my thoughts here. If the ‘whole word’ group has two rows, the first one including ambigrams that have only one geometric transformation, and the second one having more than one, shouldn’t it be the case that the same happens in the ‘each glyph’ group? Shouldn’t we have ambigrams that have only rotation, or only reflection, or only translation to each glyph separately?
Oh, I see…
Taking advantage of the jumblegram naming, I will name these types: rotatogram, reflectogram, slidogram and so on. I will leave them gray until we find out how they look like.